Amaravati: At a time period when disturbances in the support of only one capital at Amaravati have surpassed 300 days, a few people and Dalit associations are additionally holding protests in the support of the capitals city trifurcation.
Dalit associations are conducting protests at Mandadam and Tallayapalem in Tullur Mandal, demanding for decentralization capitals.
Vadithya Shankar Naik, a Dalit rights head censured previous Chief Minister Nara Chandrababu Naidu that he is just working for the advancement of one segment of the people.
Vadithya Shankar Naik stated: “He never did justice to north Andhra and Rayalaseema regions.”
He said Naidu is hindering the sanction of the land to the poor and helpless individuals in the capital district, which exhibits his so-called love towards poor people.
Parisapogu Srinivasa Rao, AP Madiga Reservation Porata Samiti (MRPS) head scrutinized the Left parties regarding why they are supporting Naidu, who is allegedly discouraging the approval of free land to poor and helpless people.
Amaravati locale MRPS convenor Mallavarapu Nagayya Madiga, Chette Raju, state Mala Mahanadu head Satta Yohan Raju and different heads held protests on the side of three capitals for the southern state.
Prior, more than a few minority rights associations’ representatives have additionally protested in Mandadam, on the side of the three capitals, not a long way from where the local individuals are demanding one capital.
Controversies have emitted in Andhra Pradesh after Chief Minister Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy reported the trifurcation of the state capital, proposing a judicial capital in Kurnool, administrative capital in Amaravati and executive capital in Visakhapatnam.
Tending to protesters at Penumaka village of Amaravathi locale, Nara Lokesh stated that it was Jaganmohan Reddy who wanted equidistant new capital to North Andhra and Rayalaseema in more than 30,000 acres of land where there would be no lack of water. Amaravati had met every one of these parameters. However, Reddy, who approved Amaravati while in Opposition totally changed his position and began moving Capital subsequent to coming to power. A ruler should show more prominent responsibility while in power yet here this CM is showing an erosion of that responsibility.
The Chief Minister contemplated that a decentralized advancement will profit all spots not like only Hyderabad in the united state prior to the bifurcation.
