As per the latest reports, the Supreme Court on Wednesday junked a request by the Maharashtra government looking for a heading to the Center to give Socio-Economic Caste Census on Other Backward Classes (OBCs), subsequent to thinking about Center’s dispute that information gathered is defective. The Maharashtra government looked for crude information gathered in the Socio-Economic Caste Census (SECC) held in 2011.
The Center told the supreme court that the SECC was turned to via separate choice by Cabinet, which was not an OBC overview but rather to discover standing status of all families in the country. A bench headed by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar noticed that according to Union of India the data examined in the activity is unusable.
The top court recorded the Center’s conflict that the information is full of slip-ups and the data gathered during Census was explicit to SC and ST as it were. The Maharashtra government looked for the crude Census information for carrying out a booking for OBC in the nearby body races.
The bench likewise containing Justice C.T. Ravikumar excused the appeal documented by the Maharashtra government, in the wake of considering the Center’s accommodation that SECC-2011 was not an activity to specify the information of in reverse classes. Specialist General Tushar Mehta addressed the Center regarding the present situation.
ALSO READ: Supreme Court Pegasus Petitioners To Submit Phones For Technical Examinations
Mehta presented that SECC-2011 was not a Census practice attempted under the Census Act 1948, rather it was done based on chief guidelines of the concerned service to list the position status of families in the country for the conveyance of designated benefits.
Subsequent to hearing definite contentions regarding the present situation, the top court said it can’t give a course to the Center to share the crude standing information of SECC-2011 with Maharashtra, as it will additionally make disarray.
In the request, the top court said: “The reality stays that the affirmation recorded under the watchful eye of this court by the Union of India earnestly expresses that information which is grouped isn’t exact and not usable.”
The bench added that assuming that is the stand taken by the public authority, then, at that point “we neglect to see how mandamus can be given to the respondent to allow the State of Maharashtra to utilize the date for any reason”.
Excusing the Maharashtra government request, the bench added, “Such heading will prompt confusion and uncertainty, which can’t be countenanced.”
(This story has been sourced from a third-party syndicated feed, agencies. Raavi Media accepts no responsibility or liability for the dependability, trustworthiness, reliability, and data of the text. Raavi Media management/ythisnews.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content at its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.)